Selected References

On volunteering:

On NPOs (in tension):

  • Chad, P., Kyriazis, E., & Motion, J. (2014). Bringing marketing into nonprofit organisations: A managerial nightmare! Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 22(4), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.09.003
  • Dempsey, S. E. (2012). Nonprofits as political actors. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911424375
  • Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 582–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333686
  • Isbell, M., Sanders, M., & Koschmann, M. (2017). Nonprofit/nongovernmental organizations. International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication.
  • King, D. (2017). Becoming Business-Like: Governing the Nonprofit Professional. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016663321

On the communicative constitution of organization (CCO)

  • Bencherki, N., & Snack, J. P. (2016). Contributorship and Partial Inclusion: A Communicative Perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915624163
  • Koschmann, M. A., Sanders, M. L. & Isbell, M. (2015). Connecting nonprofit and communication scholarship: A review of key issues and meta-theoretical framework for future research. Review of Communication, X, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2015.1058411
  • Koschmann, M. A. (2012). Developing a communicative theory of the nonprofit. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911423640
  • Schoeneborn, D. & Vásquez, C. (2017). The Communicative Constitution of Organization (CCO). In C.R. Scott and L.Lewis (General Editors), J. Barker, J. Keyton, T. Kuhn, and P. Turner (Associate Editors). The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication. Chichester : Wiley Blackwell.

On organizational ethnography and shadowing:

  • Clark, A., & Emmel, N. (2010). Using walking interviews. Realities.
  • LeBaron, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Pratt, M. G., & Fetzer, G. (2018). An Introduction to Video Methods in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117745649
  • Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
  • Matte, F., & Bencherki, N. (forthcoming). Being followed by an organization: A hauntological perspective on organizational ethnography. In F. Malbois & F. Cooren (Eds.), Methodological and Ontological Principles of Observation and Analysis: Following and Analyzing Things and Beings in Our Everyday World. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Meunier, D. & Vásquez, C. (2008). On shadowing the hybrid character of actions: A communicational approach. Communication Methods and Measures, 3(3), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450802310482
  • Yanow, D. (2012). Organizational ethnography between toolbox and world-making. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 1(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/202466741211220633